USPTO serial 78693679
COUNTRY BROOK FOODS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, MARY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COUNTRY BROOK FOODS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Charles Dougherty
J. Charles Dougherty Wright, Lindsey & Jennings LLP200 W. Capitol Ave., Ste. 2300Little Rock, AR 72201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Bacon; Baked beans; Butter; Cheese; Chili; Corn dogs; Dried fruits; Egg product; Eggs; French fried potatoes; Fried potatoes; Frozen eggs; Fruit preserves; Fruit-based filling for cakes and pies; Instant or pre-cooked soup; Instant potatoes; Jams; Jellies; Peanut butter; Potato-based snack foods; Processed edible seeds; Processed mushrooms; Processed nuts; Protein based, nutrient-dense snack bars; Roasted nuts; Salmon; Shelled nuts; Snack mix consisting primarily of processed fruits, processed nuts and/or raisins; Soup mixes; Soups | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Bagels; Barbecue dry rub; Barbecue sauce; Biscuits; Breakfast cereals; Butter biscuits; Cake mixes; Cakes; Calzones; Cereal based snack food; Cheese sauce; Chili seasoning; Chocolate-based fillings for cakes and pies; Chocolate-based ready-to-eat food bars; Custard-based fillings for cakes and pies; Extruded corn snacks; Extruded wheat snacks; Frozen confections; Fruit jellies; Granola-based snack bars; Gravy mixes; Honey; Instant pancake mixes; Ketchup; Maple syrup; Marinades; Marshmallow; Marshmallows; Mayonnaise; Mixes for bakery goods; Molasses syrup; Mustard; Pancake mixes; Pancake syrup; Pastries; Peanut butter confectionery chips; Puffed corn snacks; Ready to eat, cereal derived food bars; Salad dressings; Salsa; Sauces for barbecued meat; Seasoned coating for meat, fish, poultry; Seasonings; Snack mix consisting primarily of crackers, pretzels, candied nuts and/or popped popcorn; Table syrup; Wheat-based snack foods | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Concentrates, syrups or powders used in the preparation of soft drinks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by W3 Partners, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by W3 Partners, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named COUNTRY BROOK FOODS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 29, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 5, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 13, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 9, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 10, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 2, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 28, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 5, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 16, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |