USPTO serial 78693769
HOTSPOT WIRELESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HOTSPOT WIRELESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Foothill Ranch, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Constance I. Rimmer
CONSTANCE I RIMMER RETOSKE & ASSOCIATES30448 RANCHO VIEJO RD STE 110SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CA 92675UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 200 | Hotspot Wireless is a membership program that makes laptop computers available to its members to enable its members to gain internet access at Hotspot Wireless locations; Members sign up and are issued a Hotspot Wireless Members Card; Hotspot Wireless provides vending machines in locations such as coffee shops, Members can obtain a laptop computer from the vending machine and access the internet using the laptop computer; A Members Card called a "Hotspot Card" is available to anyone who completes an application form; The program offers has two options for members to choose from; Offer 1-- Hotspot Wireless supplies the vending machine to a location owner that has DSL or cable internet access and the owner receives a % of profits; Offer 2-- The location owner can purchase the vending machine and pays a monthly service fee; The vending machine is a stylish yet simple unit that is approximately 24 inches X 20 inches X 20 inches; It is similar to an ATM machine; It contains four Dell wi-fi ready laptop computers for members' use; The vending machine has a wireless router that can transmit a signal up to 300 feet and can handle 100 signals at once; The machine has a card reader, bill collector, and key pad; Members swipe their card, enter their PIN number, and select payment method; Payment can be made by either cash or by charging rental time to the credit card on file; Hotspot Wireless intends to install these vending machines in coffee shops, cafes, malls, hospitals, resorts and lodges, company coffee rooms, and other locations throughout the United States | ACTIVE | May 24, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2009 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 4, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 8, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |