USPTO serial 78694122
NORMANDIE CAMEMBERT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NORMANDIE CAMEMBERT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William Dunnegan
WILLIAM DUNNEGAN PERKINS & DUNNEGAN45 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10111-0100UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | cheese | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 1, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 1, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 1, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 21, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 17, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 19, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |