USPTO serial 78694224
ECLIPSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EISINGER, REBECCA MILES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ECLIPSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul W. Fulbright
PAUL W FULBRIGHT LAW OFFICE OF PAUL W FULBRIGHT PLLC2003 J J PEARCE DRRICHARDSON, TX 75081-5447UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Oil field drilling equipment and component subsystems and parts therefor, namely, drill bits, fixed cutter drill bits, and cutting elements used on drill bits including polycrystalline diamond cutting (PDC) elements and carbide cutting elements; oil field tools, namely, tools and component subsystems and component parts therefor that aid in the cutting of earthen formations including full hole bits, oil field bi-center bits, coring bits, roller cone bits, under-reamers, hole-openers, PDC cutting elements, carbide cutting elements, and stabilizers; oil field drilling services, namely, oil field coring or directional drilling services; oil field consulting services, namely engineering services, including those utilizing advanced numeric control technologies, relating to the design of components, products, processes and services related to the production and use of products that aid in the cutting of earthen formations such as drilling; and oil field repair and reconditioning services, namely the repair, restoration, refurbishing, and reconditioning of oil field drilling tools and oil field drilling equipment and the component subsystems and component parts therefor | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 4, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |