USPTO serial 78694394
Serial No. 78694394
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STERKIN, DAVID
- Law office
- OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 78694394?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George Likourezos
GEORGE LIKOUREZOS CARTER, DELUCA, FARRELL & SCHMIDT LLP445 BROADHOLLOW RD STE 225MELVILLE, NY 11747-3615UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Apple juice beverages; Brewed malt-based alcoholic beverage in the nature of a beer; Frozen fruit beverages; Frozen fruit-based beverages; Fruit-flavored beverages; Fruit-flavored beverages; Grape juice beverages; Iced fruit beverages; Malt syrup for beverages; Non-alcoholic beverages containing fruit juices; Non-alcoholic beverages with tea flavor; Non-alcoholic beverages, namely, carbonated beverages; Non-alcoholic fruit extracts used in the preparation of beverages; Non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages; Non-alcoholic malt beverage; Orange juice beverages; Pineapple juice beverages; Sherbets; Smoothies; Soy-based beverages not being milk substitutes; Syrups for beverages; Syrups for making whey-based beverages; Tomato juice; Tomato juice beverages; Vegetable juice; Vegetable juices; Whey beverages | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2006 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 5, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 4, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 9, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 1, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |