Drawing for DATAPATH DKET 6000KU TRANSPORTABLE

USPTO serial 78694509

DATAPATH DKET 6000KU TRANSPORTABLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WATSON, JULIE A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DATAPATH DKET 6000KU TRANSPORTABLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kyle M. Globerman

KYLE M GLOBERMAN NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH LLP1320 MAIN STCOLUMBIA, SC 29201-3256UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Satellite and terrestrial communication systems consisting of a combination of one or more of the following -- digital receivers, digital transceivers, digital transmitters, antennas, amplifiers, equipment racks, and building structures and other transmission subsystems, namely, up/down converters and monitor and control systemsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 1, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Sep 1, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Aug 31, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Mar 7, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 26, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance