USPTO serial 78696233
MONDO LAB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLD, BARBARA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MONDO LAB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Melanie C. Holloway
Melanie C. Holloway H.C. Park & Associates, PLC8500 Leesburg Pike, Suite 7500Vienna, VA 22182UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Consumer electronics products, namely desktop computers, notebook computers, laptop computers, computer servers, computer peripherals and parts therefor, computer monitors, computer keyboards, computer mouse, printers, scanners, facsimile machine, remote control devices for radios, Tvs, stereos and computers, multimedia projectors, co-processors, namely micro-processors and data processors, modems, computer hard drives and floppy disk drives, magnetic tape drives, CD read/write drives, digital video read/write disk drives, optical disk drives, data storage devices, namely blank magnetic data carriers and blank tapes for storage of computer data, computer docking stations, battery chargers, audio speakers, electronic and magnetic cards, namely memory cards, memory boards and computer chips, cable connectors, all for use with computers; home entertainment media centers, namely digital audio data recorders and digital video data recorders, reproduction and transmission equipment, namely cable and satellite ready tuners, radio receivers, VCR/CD/DAVID/PR players, VCR/CD/DAVID/PR recorders, digital photo players, loud speaker systems, power transformers for amplification, loudspeakers, headphones, earphones, remote controls for each of the above home entertainment media goods ; TV tuners, radio, amplifiers, loudspeakers with built-in amplifiers; cabinets for loudspeakers; telecommunication equipment, namely, telecommunication cables, telecommunication exchangers, telecommunication switches, telecommunications and data networking hardware, namely devices for transporting and aggregating voice, data, and video communications across multiple network infrastructures and communications protocols, telecommunications transmitters; electrical cable; electric and electronic apparatus and appliances for data processing and for input, output and storage of data, namely, central processing units for processing information, data, sound or images; blank magnetic and optical data carriers, computer programs recorded on tapes, cards, discs and data media for use in controlling and processing information for amplifiers and transformers for amplification; disc storage containers, computer software for electric and electronic apparatus and appliances, namely, software to control and improve audio and video equipment sound quality, downloadable application services provider software for the uploading and downloading of digital files such as music files from a database to personal computer, M.P. players and mobile telephones, and computer software for use in linking audio and video equipment; and parts therefor | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MONDO SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MONDO SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ANG Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named MONDO LAB
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 28, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 2, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 29, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 9, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 29, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 29, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 29, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 6, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 1, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 1, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 8, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |