USPTO serial 78696587
APACS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KLINE, MATTHEW
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with APACS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel Abraham
Daniel Abraham Daniel Abraham, Attorney at Law236 BroadwaySuite 209Brooklyn, NY 11211Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial analysis and consultation; Financial consultation; Financial due diligence; Financial planning consultation; Financial portfolio management; Financial risk management; Financial services in the nature of an investment security; Financial services, namely, a total portfolio offering for high net worth clients consisting of both separate accounts and mutual funds for equity and fixed income investments; Investment services, namely asset acquisition, consultation, development and management services | ABANDONED | Feb 3, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | AMPB | AMENDMENT/PETITION AFTER APPROVAL FOR PUB ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |