Drawing for POLYSTAN

USPTO serial 78696614

POLYSTAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POLYSTAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher M. Brock

CHRISTOPHER M BROCK HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE PLCP O BOX 828BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48313UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware for data processing and to automate data collections during surgeryACTIVE—
010Heart lung machines, hyperthermic and hypothermic apparatus for raising and lowering the temperature of the patient's body during surgery, medical devices for analyzing and controlling blood and gas parameters; oxygenators, containers for liquid and gases for medical purposes; blood pumps; blood filters; heat exchangers for medical purposes; catheters; injection tubes for medical purposes; custom tubing packs and valves for medical apparatus; medical blood and gas pressure indicators; annuloplasty prosthesis; mammaria retractors, bio-compatible coated surgery apparatus namely, oxygenators, reservoirs, filters, custom tubing packs, catheters, cannulae, connectors, blood bags, heat exchangers, centrifugal pumps, heart-valve and vascular prostheses, cardioplegia systems consisting primarily of cannulae and associated tubing, pumps and monitors, supporting lines for custom tubing sets, vacuum controller for medical purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 31, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 23, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 31, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 11, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 21, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 15, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 14, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 30, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 30, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 30, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 14, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 29, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance