USPTO serial 78696698
DIGITAL DISPATCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MITTLER, ROBIN M
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIGITAL DISPATCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Richmond, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Beth M. Goldman
BETH M GOLDMAN HELLER EHRMAN LLP333 BUSH STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104-2878UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and computer software for the wireless transmission of data in the fields of mobile and wireless data communications; mobile and wireless data dispatching systems consisting of computer hardware and computer software for dispatching, computer hardware and computer software for the wireless transmission of data, radio base station controllers, and mobile computer hardware and mobile computer software for dispatching; real-time dispatching systems, consisting of computer hardware and computer software for dispatching, computer hardware and computer software for the wireless transmission of data, radio base station controllers, and mobile computer hardware and mobile computer software for dispatching; vehicle location and tracking systems consisting of computer hardware and computer software for tracking vehicle location, computer hardware and computer software for wireless data transmission, radio base station controllers, and mobile computer hardware and mobile computer software for vehicle tracking; routing and scheduling systems consisting of computer hardware and computer software for routing and scheduling, computer hardware and computer software for wireless data transmission, radio base station controllers, and mobile computer hardware and mobile computer software for routing and scheduling; mobile data terminals; network gateways; software development tools; vehicle navigation computers; navigation apparatus for vehicles in the nature of on-board computers; navigation and mapping software; computer hardware and computer software for use in financial transaction processing and financial accounting applications; electronic and magnetic data sensors and computer peripherals; computer hardware for electronic transfer of data; data terminals; credit, debit and payment card transaction processing terminals; electronic cash registers, point of sale terminals, mobile terminals, mobile printers, mobile surveillance cameras, computers, computer peripherals, data entry and inquiry terminals and computer software for operations management and for processing and transferring credit, debit and payment card transactions, payments and financial data; user manuals sold as a unit therewith | ACTIVE | Sep 28, 1987 |
| 038 | Consultation and implementation support services in the fields of mobile and wireless data communications; telecommunication services, namely, transmission of voice, data and documents, in the fields of vehicle navigation and mapping information | ACTIVE | Sep 28, 1987 |
| 039 | Traffic information services in the nature of location and navigation assistance to remote users, namely, providing route support and directions; traffic information services in the nature of location and navigation assistance, namely, providing route support and directions; transportation dispatch services; transportation dispatch services through wireless data communications | ACTIVE | Sep 28, 1987 |
| 042 | Mobile and wireless data communications services; research services relating to mobile and wireless data communications; mapping services; application service provider services, namely, providing on-line, non-downloadable software for wireless data transmission in the fields of mobile and wireless data communications; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems | ACTIVE | Sep 28, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Digital Dispatch Systems Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DIGITAL DISPATCH
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 15, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 7, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 29, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |