Drawing for SUMMER GLOW

USPTO serial 78697021

SUMMER GLOW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAST, PAUL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUMMER GLOW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amy E. Carroll

AMY E CARROLL DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP1500 K ST NW STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1209UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Facial skin care products, namely, facial cleanser, cosmetic wipes and non-medicated pore clarifying strips, non-medicated facial treatment cream, gel, and lotion; non-medicated eye treatment cream, gel, lotion; facial moisturizer gel, and lotion; skin exfoliation products, namely, body scrub, facial scrub, facial cream and facial peel; cosmetics, namely, foundation, make-up, powder, concealer, eye shadow, lip color; body care products, namely, body lotion, cream and wash, shave gel, and anti-perspirant, hand cream and lotion, foot cream and lotion; non-medicated acne cleansers and acne treatment preparationsACTIVE—
005Medicated wipes and medicated pore clarifying strips; medicated acne cleansers and acne treatment preparationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 2, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 2, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 11, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 15, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 15, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2007ICNANOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 5, 2007DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 3, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 3, 2007DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 3, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 7, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 18, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 20, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 18, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 8, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 8, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 30, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 30, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 7, 2006GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 7, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 7, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 7, 2006AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2006PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance