USPTO serial 78697033
AIRFLOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AIRFLOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSIANNE SENAY
JOSIANNE SENAY GRANBY; PQC QUEBECJ2G 9J6236, AVERY,Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | IC 025; US022039; G & S: coats, overcoats, jackets, jerkins, trousers, suits and dresses, skirts, shirts, blouses, track suits, sweat shirts, singlets, pullovers, cardigans, jerseys, bathing suits, brassieres, panties, pants, neckties, scarves, hats and caps, berrets, gloves, belts, footwear, soles for footwear, heelpieces for footwear, insoles for footwear, welts for footwear, footwear uppers, tips for footwear or vamps, half soles for footwear, non-slip devices for shoes, socks, stockings and bathrobes, lining for footwear, fabrics for footwear. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 12, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2005 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |