Drawing for FARM GEAR

USPTO serial 78697177

FARM GEAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FARM GEAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William H. Hollimon

WILLIAM H HOLLIMON PENNINGTON MOORE WILKINSON BELL & DUNBAR215 S MONROE ST 2ND FLTALLAHASSEE, FL 32301UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electric gate operatorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 17, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 16, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 16, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 11, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 11, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 2, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 30, 2007EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 11, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 11, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 11, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 13, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 30, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 18, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 16, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 30, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance