Drawing for SHOOTING STARS

USPTO serial 78697231

SHOOTING STARS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALTREE, NICHOLAS
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SHOOTING STARS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Neil M. Batavia

Neil M. Batavia Dority & Manning, P.A.P.O. Box 1449Greenville, SC 29602-1449UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041entertainment services, namely, providing an online computer game; electronic casino gaming servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 9, 2019ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 6, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 5, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 5, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 22, 2010MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 22, 2010ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 22, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 14, 2009GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 2009GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Oct 13, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 13, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 13, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 17, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 17, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 10, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 10, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 3, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 3, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 3, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 10, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 10, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 10, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 17, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 9, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 22, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 9, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 30, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance