USPTO serial 78697407
IREALIZE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IREALIZE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Thornhill, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Aletta Dekkers
ALETTA DEKKERS OFFICE OF ALETTA DEKKERS STONEY CREEK; ONC ONTARIOL8J2X4950 RIDGE RD,Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Bracelets; Costume jewelry; Identification bracelets; Jewelry; Jewelry chains; Jewelry, namely, amulets; Lapel pins; Rings being jewelry | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, t-shirts, golf shirts, sweatshirts, vests, jerseys, jackets, dress shirts, tank tops, sweatpants, pants, shorts, underwear, boxer shorts, swimwear, beachwear, pajamas, coveralls, belts, hats, caps, head bands, bandanas and visors, shoes and socks, gloves and scarves | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Charitable fund raising; Memorial fund raising | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 25, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 26, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 11, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |