USPTO serial 78697655
WHAT HAPPENS IN VEGAS DOES NOT ALWAYS STAY IN VEGAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WHAT HAPPENS IN VEGAS DOES NOT ALWAYS STAY IN VEGAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marnie Wright Barnhorst, Esq.
Marnie Wright Barnhorst, Esq. Eugene Boyle5674 Crowbush CoveLas Vegas, NV 89122UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Association services, namely, advertising and promoting the interests of companies in the city of Las Vegas | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Medical research, conducting clinical trials, researching products to treat chronic debilitating diseases and development of pharmaceutical drugs | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Samaritan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Samaritan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named WHAT HAPPENS IN VEGAS DOES NOT ALWAYS STAY IN VEGAS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 19, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |