Drawing for FREEZE GEAR

USPTO serial 78697821

FREEZE GEAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAHONEY, PAULA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FREEZE GEAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Max Moskowitz

Max Moskowitz OSTROLENK, FABER, GERB & SOFFEN, LLP1180 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS FL 7NEW YORK, NY 10036-8443UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Costume jewelry, jewelry made of gold, silver, platinum, titanium, stainless steel and precious and semi-precious stones, items coated with precious metal or their alloys, namely, clocks, stop watches, watch bracelets, candlesticks, decorative boxes, jewelry boxes, cigarette lighters and money clipsACTIVE—
016Letter openersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 23, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 23, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 23, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 23, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 23, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 23, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 23, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 23, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 8, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 1, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 11, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 7, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 7, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 6, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 6, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 6, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 26, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 26, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 29, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 4, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 27, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 12, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 12, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 30, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance