Drawing for MAPIFY

USPTO serial 78698006

MAPIFY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAPIFY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nadine P. Flynn

Nadine P. Flynn BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY345 Park AvenueNEW YORK, NY 10154-0004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Medical imaging and contrast media, namely, reagents, diagnostic preparations for medical use, diagnostic imaging agents, radiopharmaceutical diagnostic imaging agents, contrast media for use in medical imagingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 11, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 11, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 29, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 29, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 29, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 26, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 26, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 26, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 19, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 19, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 19, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 10, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 16, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 27, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 28, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 24, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 12, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 8, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 2, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 2, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 2, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 2, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 20, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 19, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 17, 2006CEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED—
Mar 17, 2006CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Mar 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 30, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance