USPTO serial 78698816
DR. GOURMET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JACKSON, STEVEN W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DR. GOURMET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Household and/or kitchen utensils and containers (not of precious metal or coated therewith); sponges and brushes; articles for cleaning purposes; glassware, porcelain and earthenware; The applicant will use the mark on video or computer programs, magazines, books & newsletters and advertising for these products | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, footwear, headgear with the trademark embossed or tagged on said merchandise; The applicant will use the mark on video or computer programs, magazines, books & newsletters and advertising for these products | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 029 | Meat, fish, poultry and game; meat extracts; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, fruit sauces; eggs, milk and milk products; edible oils and fats; The applicant will use the mark on video or computer programs, magazines, books & newsletters and advertising for these products | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee: flour and preparations made from cereals, bread, pastry and confectionery, honey, treacle; yeast, baking powder; salt, mustard; vinegar, sauces (condiments); spices: ice; The applicant will use the mark on video or computer programs, magazines, books & newsletters and advertising for these products | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 041 | Education; providing of training; entertainment; sporting and cultural activities; The applicant will use the mark on video or computer programs, magazines, books & newsletters and advertising for these products | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 043 | Providing of food and drink; temporary accommodation; The applicant will use the mark on video or computer programs, magazines, books & newsletters and advertising for these products | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 044 | Medical, hygenic and beauty care; agricultural services; computer programming; The applicant will use the mark on video or computer programs, magazines, books & newsletters and advertising for these products | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Timothy S. Harlan M.D.
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named DR. GOURMET
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |