USPTO serial 78698889
SM NEW YORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SM NEW YORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LONG ISLAND CITY, NY
LONG ISLAND CITY, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jenifer deWolf Paine
JENIFER DEWOLF PAINE TRADEMARK DEPARRTMENTPROSKAUER ROSE LLP1585 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10036-8299Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Fragrances for personal use and cosmetics | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | Eyewear, namely, eyeglasses, sunglasses, and their cases | ABANDONED | — |
| 014 | Watches | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, jeans, t-shirts, sweat suits, shirts, dresses, mens' and women's pants, shirts, jackets, caps, underwear, hosiery, socks, blouses, shorts, skirts, tights, outerwear in the nature of sweaters, vests, blazers, coats, gloves, and scarves | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by STEVEN MADDEN, LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by STEVEN MADDEN, LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named SM NEW YORK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2007 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 8, 2007 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 2, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |