Drawing for SALAMAT

USPTO serial 78698925

SALAMAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CASTRO, GIANCARLO
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SALAMAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph S. Farzam, Esq.

JOSEPH S FARZAM ESQ LAW OFFICES OF FARZAM & ASSOCIATES1875 CENTURY PARK E STE 690LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-2501UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Dried beans; Dried beef; Dried edible algae; Dried edible seaweed; Dried eggs; Dried figs; Dried flakes of laver for sprinkling on rice in hot water; Dried fruit mixes; Dried fruits; Dried meat; Dried pieces of agar jelly; Dried soybeans; Dried vegetablesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 24, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 24, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 22, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 30, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 10, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 10, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 31, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 24, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 24, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 11, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 11, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 10, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 31, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance