USPTO serial 78699134
SCREW YOU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 24, 2013
- Examiner
- LEE, JANET H
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SCREW YOU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Jebaraj.Kenneth.Gnadadurai.Screw You
lincoln, GB
Other trademarks owned by Jebaraj.Kenneth.Gnadadurai.Screw You
Jebaraj.Kenneth.Gnadadurai.Screw You
London, GB
Other trademarks owned by Jebaraj.Kenneth.Gnadadurai.Screw You
Jebaraj.Kenneth.Gnadadurai.Screw You
London, GB
Other trademarks owned by Jebaraj.Kenneth.Gnadadurai.Screw You
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tom Tatonetti
Tom Tatonetti Tatonetti IP441 72nd Street, 2FLBrooklyn, NY 11209UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | BATH SANDALS; BATH SLIPPERS; BATHING CAPS; BATHING DRAWERS; BATHING SUITS; BATHING TRUNKS; BATHROBES; BEACH SHOES; BELTS; MONEY BELTS; BIKINIS; BLOUSE; BOOTS; BOOTS FOR SPORTS; BOWTIES; BOXER SHORTS; BRACES FOR CLOTHING; BRAS; BRASSIERES; CAMISOLES; CARDIGANS; COATS; DINNER JACKETS; DINNER SUITS; DRESSES; DRESSING GOWNS; EAR MUFFS; EVENING DRESSES; EVENING SHIRTS; EVENING SHOES; FOOTBALL BOOTS AND SHOES; FOOTWEAR; FORMAL SHIRTS; FORMAL SHOES; FORMAL SKIRTS; FORMAL SUITS; FORMAL NECKTIES; FORMAL TROUSERS; FROCKS; FUR COATS; FUR STOLES; GIRDLES; GLOVES; GYMNASTIC SHOES; HALF BOOTS; HEELS; HIGHHEEL SHOES; HOT PANTS; HOUSECOATS; JACKETS; JACKETS WITH HOOD; JEANS; JERSEYS; JOGGING SUITS; JUMPERS; KNICKERS; LACE BOOTS; LEATHER AND IMITATION LEATHER JACKETS; LEATHER AND IMITATION LEATHER SKIRTS; LEATHER AND IMITATION LEATHER TROUSERS; LEGGINGS; LINGERIE; LONGJOHNS; MOTORISTS JACKETS; MOTORISTS TROUSERS; NECKBOWS; NECKTIES; NECK WEAR; NIGHTDRESSES; NIGHTWEAR; OVERALLS; OVERCOATS; PANTS; PARTY FROCKS; PELERINES; PELISSES; PETTICOATS; PULLOVERS; PYJAMAS; RAIN COATS; RAINWEAR; ROBES; SANDALS; SARIS; SARONGS; SCARVES; SHAWLS; SHIRTS; SHOES; SHORTS; SHOULDER WRAPS; SINGLETS; SKI BOOTS; SKIRTS; SLIPPERS; SLIPS; SMOCKS; SNEAKERS; SNOWSUITS; SOCK SUSPENDERS; SOCKS; SPORTS JERSEYS; SPORTS SHOES; STOCKING SUSPENDERS; STOCKINGS; STUDS FOR FOOTBALL BOOTS AND SHOES; STUFF JACKETS; SUITS; SUSPENDER; SWEAT SHIRTS; SWEAT TOPS; SWEAT-ABSORBENT UNDERCLOTHING; SWEATBANDS; SWEATERS; SWIMSUITS; TUXEDO; TEDDIES; THONGS; TIGHTS, TOGAS; TOPCOATS; TROUSERS; UNDER VESTS; UNDERCLOTHING; UNDERPANTS; UNDERSHIRTS; UNDERWEAR; UNIFORMS; VEILS; WAISTCOATS; WATERPROOF JACKETS; WEDDING DRESSES; WET SUITS; WOMENS' SLIPS; WORK BOOTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Jebaraj.Kenneth.Gnadadurai.Screw You
- Other trademarks owned by Jebaraj.Kenneth.Gnadadurai.Screw You
- Other trademarks owned by Jebaraj.Kenneth.Gnadadurai.Screw You
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named SCREW YOU
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2024 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 24, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2020 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2020 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 16, 2020 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2019 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Oct 8, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 19, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2019 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 20, 2013 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2013 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 12, 2013 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 23, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 1, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2013 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2013 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 7, 2013 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | 44EG | 44(e) PETITION - GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | TPAD | TEAS PETITION TO AMEND BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 23, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 23, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 24, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 9, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 9, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 30, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 1, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 28, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 6, 2009 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2009 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 18, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 17, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | OTHE | CASE RETURNED TO EXAMINATION | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 29, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 9, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |