USPTO serial 78699502
SPITFIRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AMOS, TANYA L
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SPITFIRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha (Honda Motor Co., Ltd.)
Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha (Honda Motor Co., Ltd.)
Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha (Honda Motor Co., Ltd.)
Minato-Ku, JP
Other trademarks owned by Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha (Honda Motor Co., Ltd.)
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Bevilacqua
Michael J. Bevilacqua Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LL60 State StreetBoston, MA 02109UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | motorcycles and structural parts thereof | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha (Honda Motor Co., Ltd.)
- Other trademarks owned by Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha (Honda Motor Co., Ltd.)
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named SPITFIRE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 14, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 14, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 13, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 12, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |