USPTO serial 78699562
THE INTEROPERABLE EMR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3172702Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 14, 2006
- Examiner
- WEIGLE, KATHERINE CONNOLLY
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE INTEROPERABLE EMR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, CA
Toronto, Ontario M3C 1H9, CA
JOHNSTOWN, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John M. Haschak
John M. Haschak Leventry, Haschak, and Rodkey, LLC1397 Eisenhower BoulevardSuite 202Johnstown, PA 15904Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for automating clinical information and for medical practice management | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 29, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 5, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 15, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 14, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 10, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |