Drawing for COCONUT FRED'S FRUIT SALAD ISLAND

USPTO serial 78699785

COCONUT FRED'S FRUIT SALAD ISLAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
โ€”
Examiner
WATSON, JULIE A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COCONUT FRED'S FRUIT SALAD ISLAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Janet A. Kobrin

Janet A. Kobrin WARNER BROS.4000 WARNER BOULEVARDBRIDGE BUILDING NORTH, 5TH FLOORBURBANK, CA 91522

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services in the nature of live-action, comedy, drama and animated television series; production of live-action, comedy, drama and animated television series; production of live-action, comedy, drama and animated motion picture theatrical films; providing live theatrical performances featuring a combination of live and animated action performances; internet services, namely providing information via an electronic global computer network in the field of entertainment relating specifically to music, movies, and television; providing general interest news about current events and entertainment and information related to education and cultural events; and providing information for and actual entertainment via an electronic global communications network in the nature of live-action, comedy, drama and animated programs and production of live-action, comedy, drama and animated motion picture films for distribution via a global computer networkACTIVEโ€”

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 5, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 5, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 3, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTEDโ€”
Sep 3, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGALโ€”
Aug 7, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILEDโ€”
Aug 7, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 8, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTEDโ€”
Dec 8, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILEDโ€”
Dec 8, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 7, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTEDโ€”
Aug 7, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILEDโ€”
Aug 7, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 6, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTEDโ€”
Dec 6, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILEDโ€”
Dec 6, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 6, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTEDโ€”
Jul 6, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILEDโ€”
Jul 6, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 6, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline โ€” usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 12, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 22, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATIONโ€”
Oct 20, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETEDโ€”
Oct 6, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIEโ€”
Oct 2, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
Sep 22, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTEREDโ€”
Sep 15, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Sep 15, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Mar 14, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Sep 1, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTEREDโ€”

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance