USPTO serial 78699926
TENDERFEETSHOES DIABETIC FOOTWEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TENDERFEETSHOES DIABETIC FOOTWEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Agoura Hills, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Prescription orthopedic footwear; prescription orthotic inserts for footwear | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 8, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 12, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 21, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |