USPTO serial 78700288
LAS VEGAS LIDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LAS VEGAS LIDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
H. Michael Brucker
H MICHAEL BRUCKER L/O OF H MICHAEL BRUCKER5855 DOYLE ST STE 110EMERYVILLE, CA 94608UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Headwear | ACTIVE | Jan 12, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2007 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 7, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 19, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 20, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |