USPTO serial 78700751
SIMPLICITY BETTER LIVING MADE EASIER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SIMPLICITY BETTER LIVING MADE EASIER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Betsy Peterzell
2999 DEVONSHIRE PL NWATLANTA, GA 30327-1602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Ceramic tiles for flooring and facing; Ceramic tiles for flooring and lining; Ceramic tiles for tile floors and coverings; Fabric for underlayment of flooring; Floor boards ; Floor panels; Floor tiles of wood; Flooring underlayments; Laminate flooring; Marble; Non-metal floor tiles; Non-metal floors; Non-metal tiles; Parquet flooring and parquet slabs; Parquet flooring made of cork; Parquet flooring made of wood; Parquet flooring of cork; Parquet flooring of wood; Parquet wood flooring; Rubber floor tiles; Rubber flooring; Slate; Stucco tiles; Synthetic flooring materials or wall-claddings; Tiles of clay, glass, gypsum, ceramic or earthenware ; Veneer for floors; Vinyl tiles; Wood tile floors ; Wooden flooring | ACTIVE | Mar 18, 2004 |
| 027 | Carpet backing; Carpet padding; Carpet tiles; Carpet underlay; Carpet underlays; Carpet underlining; Carpeting; Carpets; Carpets, rugs, mats and matting, linoleum for covering existing floors; Decorative slip-resistant floor covering in sheet form; Floor coverings; Hard surface coverings for floors; Linoleum for use on floors; Primary carpet backing; Protective floor coverings; Resilient hard surface covering for floors, walls and other surfaces; Rugs; Vinyl floor coverings | ACTIVE | Mar 18, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 15, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 7, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |