USPTO serial 78700985
HUDSON VALLEY WEDDINGS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3494328Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 26, 2008
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, LESLIE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HUDSON VALLEY WEDDINGS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mamaroneck, NY
ELMSFORD, NY
ELMSFORD, NY
WILMINGTON, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ned W. Branthover
NED W BRANTHOVER ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVE FL 10NEW YORK, NY 10017-4046UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Magazines featuring topics of interest concerning all aspects of weddings | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 31, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Spotlight Publications LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SUBURBAN PUBLISING, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SUBURBAN PUBLISING, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MARTINELLI HOLDINGS, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named HUDSON VALLEY WEDDINGS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 18, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2008 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 28, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 26, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |