USPTO serial 78701010
CYBERFUSION INTEGRATION SUITE (CFI)
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRAZIER, TAMARA G
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CYBERFUSION INTEGRATION SUITE (CFI)?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Proginet's CyberFusion Integration Suite (CFI) is a totally integrated advanced managed file transfer solution that provides a single point of control for all file transfer activity inside and outside the extended enterprise; A multi-platform solution that serves the mainframe world and all major distributed platforms, CFI enables organizations to conduct all file transfer securely and efficiently with suppliers, business partners, and customers, and to integrate with a broad range of B2B applications in support of end-to-end processing; CFI is comprised of three major components, as detailed below-- CFI Command Center CFI Command Center provides a single point of control to manage all enterprise file transfers, inside and outside the enterprise, and across all platforms; The Command Center's Web-based interface provides a single view of all file transfer activity, including server management, user profiles, alerts, status reporting, and audit logging - exactly what is required to keep a pulse on the incoming and outbound file transfers of a company and the company's business partners; CFI Platform Server CFI Platform Server's core strength is handling multi-platform transfers; The Platform Server provides total security and control for every file entering or leaving the enterprise, regardless of platform; The Platform Server's peer-to-peer architecture, enterprise-level automation, and high-volume file transfer capabilities enable seamless integration with other enterprise applications to deliver true end-to-end processing; CFI Internet Server CFI Internet Server enables organizations to exchange information securely over the Internet - with complete control; The Internet Server is ideal for integrating with trading partners; their only requirement is a standard Web browser (no software is required on the client side); CyberFusion Integration Suite provides all the elements for companies to gain full control of all file transfers throughout the enterprise with total security and auditability; CFI's value proposition is underpinned by the following fundamental concepts-- Single Point of Control, Total Security, Total Auditability,Guaranteed Delivery,Access over all Networks,End to End, Inside and Outside the Enterprise | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2007 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 6, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 30, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |