USPTO serial 78701434
MICHAEL'S MIRACLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ESTRADA, LINDA M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MICHAEL'S MIRACLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William G. Gardner, Esquire
WILLIAM G GARDNER ESQ JAMES B GRIFFIN PC623 N POTTSTOWN PIKEEXTON, PA 19341-1679UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Accepting and administering monetary charitable contributions; and Charitable fund raising | ABANDONED | Sep 15, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 16, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 26, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |