Drawing for SLEEP COUNSELOR

USPTO serial 78701477

SLEEP COUNSELOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DWYER, JOHN D
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SLEEP COUNSELOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William E. Marames

WILLIAM E MARAMES ARENT FOX PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5399UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035retail store services featuring mattresses, bedding, bedsprings, bed frames, and bedding related accessoriesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 24, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 23, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 23, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 4, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 9, 2007GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2007GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jun 20, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 20, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 20, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 1, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 1, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 10, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 18, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 18, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 2, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance