Drawing for VUE TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 78701746

VUE TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COWARD, KATHRYN E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with VUE TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Aaron D. Hendelman

AARON D HENDELMAN WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI650 PAGE MILL RDPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1050UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009radio frequency identification (RFID) receivers, RFID transmitters, RFID switches, RFID routers, RFID antennas and RFID readers, and radio frequency identification tags all for item tracking, item identification, document tracking, document identification, inventory management, the exchange of information to and from a customer database, and the exchange of information to and from a general database; computer software for item tracking, item identification, document tracking, document identification, inventory management, the exchange of information to and from a customer database, and the exchange of information to and from a general database; computer software for use in the field of radio frequency identification; computer software for controlling radio frequency identification receivers, transmitters, switches, routers, antennas and readersACTIVE—
042development of computer software for radio frequency identification (RFID) receivers, RFID transmitters, RFID switches, RFID antennas and RFID readers, and radio frequency identification tags; technical consultation in the field of radio frequency identification (RFID) receivers, RFID transmitters, RFID switches, RFID routers, RFID antennas and RFID readers, and radio frequency identification tagsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 30, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 30, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 18, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2006COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 9, 2005AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Sep 9, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance