USPTO serial 78702237
EUROPEAN POKER TOUR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EUROPEAN POKER TOUR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SUSAN UPTON DOUGLASS
SUSAN UPTON DOUGLASS FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.866 UNITED NATIONS PLAZANEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable electronic publications, namely, newsletters in the field of poker; Prerecorded audio and video tapes, cassettes, discs, cartridges, media cards, CDs, and DVDs featuring poker tournaments and poker information | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services and sporting and cultural activities, namely, poker tournaments; Organization, production and presentation of poker tournaments, competitions, contests, games and events for entertainment purposes; Presentation of poker tournaments, competitions, contests, games and events rendered through the media of television or provided on-line from a computer database or via the Internet; Television entertainment services, namely, providing a television program in the field of poker; Providing news and information via a global computer network in the field of poker; Providing information on-line from databases and the Internet in the field of poker; Providing on-line electronic publications, namely, newsletters in the field of poker; Providing electronic newsletters distributed via the internet and electronic mail in the field of poker; Providing information, consultation, and advisory services in the field of poker tournaments, competitions, contests, games and events and in the field of providing information about poker tournaments, competitions, contests, games and events; Providing on-line computer gaming services accessed via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 10, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 8, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |