USPTO serial 78702617
VHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 29, 2007
- Examiner
- RINGLE, JAMES W
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with VHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Osaka, JP
Naniwa-ku, Osaka, 556-8601, JP
Osaka, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mainak H. Mehta
Mainak H. Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B. Street, Suite 2200,San Diego, CA 92101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | [ Power-operated tillers, gear cutters, and rechargeable bush cutters; agricultural machines, namely, lawn mowers, combines, threshers, reapers, binders, rice planters, seedling planters; earth moving machines, namely, backhoes and loaders; bulldozers; power-operated field sprayers, electric generators, electric pumps for agricultural sprayers, hydraulic and mechanical valves for agricultural use; engines not for land vehicles; parts for lawn mowers, namely, mower decks; mulchers, namely, machines for laying mulch on the furrows or on the farm fields, grass catchers; construction machinery, namely, earth moving machines, namely, graders; excavating machines; truck cranes; power shovels; foundation work machines; earth augers; pile-drivers; pile-extractors; ground surface finishing and compacting machines; earth moving machines, namely, scrapers; concrete placing machines; concrete vibrators; concrete paving machines; concrete mixers; asphalt paving machines; dredging machines; mud dredging machines ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | Off-road all terrain utility vehicles; sport utility vehicles; tractors and structural parts therefor; trailers and structural parts therefor; personal mobility vehicles, namely motorized scooters and motorized wheelchairs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2017 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 3, 2017 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Jul 3, 2017 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 24, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 6, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 21, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 28, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 26, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |