Drawing for DOOPH

USPTO serial 78702846

DOOPH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DOOPH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Angela Washelesky

Angela Washelesky REED SMITH LLP10 S. Wacker Dr.Chicago, IL 60606-7507UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Promoting the goods and services of others online via an automated system that schedules, distributes and disseminates promotional coupons and special offers relating to food and drink and surplus food and drink for restaurants and eating and drinking establishmentsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 31, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 31, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 31, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 8, 2008LEXTLATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST—
Dec 8, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 4, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 4, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 28, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 22, 2008PGEXPETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED—
Feb 14, 2008PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 5, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 5, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 14, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 5, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 19, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 12, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 23, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 20, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 10, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 30, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 27, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 27, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 27, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 27, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 27, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 8, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 19, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 19, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2005GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 2, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 22, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 6, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance