USPTO serial 78702969
A ALLOCCO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with A ALLOCCO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Villa Gobernador Gálvez, AR
Villa Gobernador Gálvez, AR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arturo Perez-Guerrero
Arturo Perez-Guerrero LAW OFFICES OF ARTURO PEREZ-GUERREROP.O.BOX 9024163SAN JUAN, PR 00902-4163UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines and equipment used to process oilseeds and sunflower in order to extract and produce vegetable oils, namely, mechanical breakers, flakers and dehullers used to grind oilseeds and sunflower; granulators used to increase the volume and density of the flour that is extracted from sunflower; agricultural machines and instruments, namely, strainers and presses used to press and strain oil-rich seeds as part of the oil extraction process | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Rotating conditioning machines used to dry and cool oilseeds in order to condition them prior to the flaking process; rotating dryer machines used to dry the extracted extracted flour prior to packaging; machines used to dry and cool off expanded oilseeds and sunflower prior to oil extraction; machines used to dry and cool extracted flour prior to storing it | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical research in the fields of vegetable oil, protection flours and alternative fuel and renewable energy production; engineering services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ALLOCCO S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by ALLOCCO S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named A ALLOCCO
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 8, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 13, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 7, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 9, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 8, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 17, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 30, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 28, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 10, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 9, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 9, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 18, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 16, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |