Drawing for SUCCESS BEGINS HERE

USPTO serial 78703167

SUCCESS BEGINS HERE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAMMEL, LAURA A
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUCCESS BEGINS HERE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott B. Schwartz

Scott B. Schwartz Cozen O'Connor1900 Market StreetTrademark/Copyright GroupPhiladelphia, PA 19103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Pre-recorded audio tapes and video tapes and pre-recorded cd's and dvd's featuring K-12 curriculum, reading skill development and vocabulary development; computer software and interactive computer software for providing instruction in K-12 curriculum subject matter and reading skill development and vocabulary developmentACTIVE—
016Books and printed curriculums in the field of education and featuring K-12 curriculum, reading skill development and vocabulary development; educational instructional kits comprised of printed parent guides for K-12 curriculum subject matter, vocabulary flash cards, and educational reading books, workbooks and magazines for students in grades K-12ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 23, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 20, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 20, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 4, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 23, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 22, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 20, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 18, 2008DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 15, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 12, 2008DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 20, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 20, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 1, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 19, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 19, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 20, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 26, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 6, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 2, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 27, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 26, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 24, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 24, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 24, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 11, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 5, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 20, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 18, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 18, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 18, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 22, 2005AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Dec 22, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance