USPTO serial 78704002
FORERUNNER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PARKER, JUSTINE D
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FORERUNNER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Taichung Hsien, TW
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James M. Slattery
JAMES M SLATTERYPO BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Blood pressure measuring apparatus, Electronic blood pressure measuring apparatus, Clinical thermometer, Fever thermometers, Thermometers for medical purposes, Pulse measuring devices, Pulse measuring apparatus, Heartbeat measuring apparatus, Patient stretchers, Apparatus for physical training for medical use, namely, a walking assistance bike for physical redevelopment, Pulse and blood pressure meters | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Electronic dartboard, darts, Amusement game machines, LCD game machines, Stand alone video game machines, Gymnastic and Exercising equipment, namely, Rowing machines, Chest expanders, weight lifting machines, Stationary exercise bicycles, stationary recumbent and upright exercise bicycles, stationary exercise bikes, manually operated jogging machines, powered treadmills for running, Elliptical trainer machines, Machines for physical exercises, Bar-bells, abdominal boards; manually operated exercise equipment for arm-strengthening, Arm exercising machines, Legs exercising machines, skiing machines for exercising, exercise machines, Exercise benches; ball pitching machines, Athletic protective pads for protecting knee, wrist, chest, shoulder, neck, hand, ear, elbow, arm, and ankle | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2009 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 25, 2008 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 2007 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2007 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2007 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 19, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 1, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |