Drawing for HAVE YOUR CAKE AND COOKIE TOO

USPTO serial 78704299

HAVE YOUR CAKE AND COOKIE TOO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRENCH, CURTIS W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HAVE YOUR CAKE AND COOKIE TOO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

S. Roxanne Edwards

S. Roxanne Edwards Baker & McKenzie LLP2001 Ross Avenue2300 Trammel Crow CenterDallas, TX 75201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail store services in the field of cookies, balloons, specialty baskets, novelty containers, mugs, cookie greeting cards, coffee, soft drinks, greeting cards, candy, chocolates, and stuffed animals; mail order services and online ordering services in the field of cookies, balloons, specialty baskets, novelty containers, mugs and cookie greeting cardsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 6, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 6, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 4, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 4, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 4, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 9, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 25, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 25, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 27, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 2, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 13, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 13, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 13, 2006AMPBAMENDMENT/PETITION AFTER APPROVAL FOR PUB ENTERED—
Oct 22, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 20, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 16, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 21, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 16, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 16, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 8, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance