Drawing for MICROSOFT CONVERGENCE

USPTO serial 78704501

MICROSOFT CONVERGENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STERKIN, DAVID
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MICROSOFT CONVERGENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William O. Ferron, Jr.

WILLIAM O FERRON JR SEED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP PLL701 5TH AVE STE 6300SEATTLE, WA 98104-7092UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035advertising services; business services, namely, business consultation services, business advice and information services; business research services; business marketing services; and business consulting servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 29, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Oct 27, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 26, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 19, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 17, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 17, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 8, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance