USPTO serial 78704865
Serial No. 78704865
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 19, 2006
- Examiner
- FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with Serial No. 78704865?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $797*
Plus Government fees of $2,550
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Westport, CT, US
Westport, CT, US
Westport, CT, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Theodore H. Davis Jr.
Theodore H. Davis Jr. Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP1100 Peachtree Street, Suite 2800Atlanta, GA 30309United StatesGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2024 | NURC | NOTICE OF UPDATED REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2024 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 27, 2024 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2024 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Nov 22, 2024 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Nov 21, 2024 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 25, 2024 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2024 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Mar 13, 2024 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2024 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jan 29, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 24, 2023 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 24, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 30, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 30, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 8, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 7, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 27, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 7, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 5, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 4, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |