USPTO serial 78705004
ESCO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SLOAN, CYNTHIA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ESCO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin S. Lemack
KEVIN S LEMACK NIELDS & LEMACK176 E MAIN ST STE 7WESTBOROUGH, MA 01581-1763UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Laboratory equipment, namely, biological safety cabinets, safety cabinets for scientific purposes, fume cupboards for laboratory use, furniture adapted for laboratory use, laboratory centrifuges, electrical incubators, incubators for bacteria culture, incubators for laboratory use, instruments for nucleic acid polymerase chain reactions, namely, vertical laminar flow cabinet, protective garments for use in clean rooms, scientific apparatus for laboratory use (other than for medical diagnosis for the protection and safety of product, operator and environment for use in life sciences research, animal handling, cytotoxic, polymerase chain reaction processes; scientific apparatus for sample preparation, incubation, cell culture and sample storage, weighing cabinets having protection and safety features for product, operator and environment for use in laboratories, ultralow temperature freezers for use in laboratories, carbon dioxide incubators for use in laboratories | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2001 |
| 011 | Air purifying units for commercial and industrial use, air filters for industrial installations, air conditioning apparatus for use in operating theatres, air conditioning apparatus for use in clean rooms, apparatus for the supply of sterile air, namely, fume cupboards, industrial air purifiers, cabinets for clean air work stations, air purification units for clean air cabinets, extractors, namely, ventilation hoods, freezer for industrial installations, freezer storage units, industrial air purifiers,namely, fume extractors, fans for industrial air purifier fume extractors, air filters for fume extractors | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 23, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 5, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |