USPTO serial 78705408
BLAZING A TRAIL INTO THE FUTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BURNS, ELLEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BLAZING A TRAIL INTO THE FUTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John W. Greenwald
JOHN W GREENWALD GARDNER GROFF PC2018 POWERS FERRY RD SE STE 800ATLANTA, GA 30339-7202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | game-animal recovery products, namely, an arrow-carried dispenser loaded with an enhanced-visibility tracer agent for use by bowhunters to track game animals wounded by the arrow, and a firearm-propelled projectile including a dispenser portion loaded with the enhanced-visibility tracer agent for use by hunters with firearms to track game animals wounded by the projectile, the enhanced-visibility tracer agent being such as a luminescent substance (e;g;, luminol), an effervescent substance (e;g;, a baking soda and citric acid antacid such as ALKA-SELZER® brand antacid), a fluorescent substance (e;g;, a fluorescent pigment that is visible by the naked eye in daylight and glows under a black light at night); trail-marking products for use by hunters to mark their trail into and/or out of the woods, namely, a hand-held dispenser (e;g;, a shoe polish-style dispenser) loaded with an enhanced-visibility agent, the enhanced-visibility tracer agent being such as a luminescent substance (e;g;, luminol), an effervescent substance (e;g;, a baking soda and citric acid antacid such as ALKA-SELZER® brand antacid), a fluorescent substance (e;g;, a fluorescent pigment that is visible by the naked eye in daylight and glows under a black light at night); and marking products for use by hunters to mark their hunting gear with an indicia such as their name to identify the gear as theirs, namely, a hand-held dispenser (e;g;, a pen- or highlighter-style dispenser) loaded with an enhanced-visibility agent, the enhanced-visibility tracer agent being such as a luminescent substance (e;g;, luminol), an effervescent substance (e;g;, a baking soda and citric acid antacid such as ALKA-SELZER® brand antacid), a fluorescent substance (e;g;, a fluorescent pigment that is visible by the naked eye in daylight and glows under a black light at night) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 9, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 20, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |