Drawing for 212E

USPTO serial 78705419

212E

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RUTLAND, BARBARA A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 212E?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Raymond Bates

Raymond Bates Little, Bates & Kelehear, PCThe Landmark Bldg5th FloorDalton, GA 30722-0488

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electron tubesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 7, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 28, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 18, 2009TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 18, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 18, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 1, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 16, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 16, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 3, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 31, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 30, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 8, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 29, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 29, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 10, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 10, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 10, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 1, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 6, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 17, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 14, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 14, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 29, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 29, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 5, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 25, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 25, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 24, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 9, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance