Drawing for QUASAR

USPTO serial 78705538

QUASAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SERVANCE, RENEE L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QUASAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Morton Amster, Esq.

Morton Amster, Esq. AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN LLP90 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016-1301UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009combination television sets and videocassette recorders, combination television sets and DVD players, combination television sets, videocassette recorders and DVD players, camcorders, DVC/DVD camcorders, SD camcorders, HD camcorders, DVD players and recorders, BD DVD recorders, digital still cameras, videocassette recorders, telephones, cordless phones; home audio products, namely, CD players, MP3 players, audio cassette players, audio speakers, amplifiers, digital audio players and digital voice recorders, radios, radio tuners, home theater in a box, namely DVD/CD player, audio amplifier and speakers, receivers, namely, radio and audio receivers, and turntables; portable audio products, namely, CD players, MP3 players, audio cassette players, digital audio players and digital voice recorders, radios; car audio products, namely, CD players, MP3 players, audio cassette players, audio speakers, amplifiers, digital audio players and digital voice recorders, radios, radio tuners and microwave ovens for laboratory useACTIVE—
011microwave ovens for cookingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 17, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 17, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 23, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 23, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 7, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 7, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 27, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 19, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 19, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 15, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 18, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 18, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 6, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 16, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 20, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 20, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 16, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 24, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 4, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 7, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 9, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 27, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 27, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 27, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 25, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 25, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 16, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 9, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance