CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for OPTIMUM

USPTO serial 78705671

OPTIMUM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OPTIMUM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David L. Principe

David L. Principe Hodgson Russ LLPThe Guaranty Building140 Pearl Street, Suite 100Buffalo, NY 14202-4040

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Wood preservatives for plant use onlyACTIVE—
002Wood preservative compositions; preservative cartridges for controlling decay in wood; wood preservative bandages; primer-sealers for application on fire retardant, treated wood; wood stains and wood toners; wood, masonry, and stucco sealers; color additive compositions for use with wood preservatives; wood stains that are mixed with wood preservatives; chemical compositions for preserving wood and other materials of cellulose origin; corrosion inhibiting coatings; corrosion inhibiting coatings for protecting steel pilingsACTIVE—
019Treated woodACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 11, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 11, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 9, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 9, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 9, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 23, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 8, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 8, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 3, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 7, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 12, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 1, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 1, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 6, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 16, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 27, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 1, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 21, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 20, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 20, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 20, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 21, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 12, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 12, 2006COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2006GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 21, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 16, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 9, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance