Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78705733?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78705733. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns DAKOTA CUB AIRCRAFT?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78705733, the listed owner(s) include: DAKOTA CUB AIRCRAFT, INC., Erickson, Mark D.

What is USPTO serial number 78705733?

Serial number 78705733 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark DAKOTA CUB AIRCRAFT. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of DAKOTA CUB AIRCRAFT?

DAKOTA CUB AIRCRAFT (78705733) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover DAKOTA CUB AIRCRAFT?

The public record lists International Classes: 012. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 78705733

DAKOTA CUB AIRCRAFT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Sep 1, 2005
Status date: Jun 8, 2009
Registration date: —
Examiner: DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
Law office: TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DAKOTA CUB AIRCRAFT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

DAKOTA CUB AIRCRAFT, INC.
BRANDON, SD
Other trademarks owned by DAKOTA CUB AIRCRAFT, INC.
Erickson, Mark D
Brandon, SD
Other trademarks owned by Erickson, Mark D

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William D. Wiese

William D. Wiese DuBois, Bryant & Campbell, LLP700 Lavaca, Suite 1300Austin, TX 78701UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
012	Aircraft and structural parts therefor	ACTIVE	Aug 26, 1993

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Jun 9, 2009	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Jun 8, 2009	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Jun 8, 2009	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Mar 25, 2009	EXAR	EXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART	—
Dec 24, 2008	GNSN	NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED	—
Dec 24, 2008	GNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED	—
Dec 24, 2008	CNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED	—
Nov 3, 2008	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Oct 30, 2008	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Oct 30, 2008	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Apr 30, 2008	GNFN	NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	—
Apr 30, 2008	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 30, 2008	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 4, 2008	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 4, 2008	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
Apr 4, 2008	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Apr 4, 2008	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Apr 4, 2008	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 31, 2008	GAUN	NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED	—
Mar 31, 2008	GAUD	NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED	—
Mar 31, 2008	NAUD	REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED	—
Mar 12, 2008	ASGN	AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP	—
Mar 11, 2008	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Mar 10, 2008	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Mar 10, 2008	ERSI	TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED	—
Mar 7, 2008	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 7, 2008	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
Jan 7, 2008	GNS3	NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED	—
Jan 7, 2008	GNSL	LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED	—
Jan 7, 2008	CNSL	SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN	—
Dec 17, 2007	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Dec 17, 2007	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Dec 12, 2007	FAXX	FAX RECEIVED	—
Jul 11, 2007	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2007	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2007	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2007	RCCK	SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION	—
Jun 18, 2007	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Dec 18, 2006	GNSL	LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED	—
Dec 18, 2006	CNSL	SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN	—
Nov 27, 2006	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Nov 7, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Nov 7, 2006	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 7, 2006	PETG	PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED	—
Nov 7, 2006	PROA	TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED	—
Nov 6, 2006	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 6, 2006	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
Oct 20, 2006	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 20, 2006	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 24, 2006	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2006	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Sep 9, 2005	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—