Drawing for JEWELCHROME

USPTO serial 78705902

JEWELCHROME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JEWELCHROME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward W. Gray, Jr.

Edward W. Gray, Jr. Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery120 S. LaSalle StreetSuite 1600Chicago, IL 60603-3406

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed matter, namely catalogs and magazines in the field of jewelryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 9, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 9, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 9, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 9, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 9, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 9, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 9, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 9, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 9, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 9, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 9, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 9, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 9, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 17, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 27, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 3, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 25, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 23, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 20, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 19, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 19, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 19, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 3, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 20, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 20, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 9, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance