USPTO serial 78705916
BRILLIANT SOLUTIONS FOR THE LUXURY MARKETPLACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BRILLIANT SOLUTIONS FOR THE LUXURY MARKETPLACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward W. Gray, Jr.
Edward W. Gray, Jr. Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery120 S. LaSalle StreetSuite 1600Chicago, IL 60603-3406Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed materials, namely catalogs, and magazines in the field of jewelry and luxury goods, namely, watches, necklaces, bracelets, rings, earrings, emeralds, diamond, gem, and ornaments of silver | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | On-line retail store services in the field of gifts and jewelry; direct marketing advertising for others, namely advertising and marketing services by way of solicitation, customer service and providing marketing information via web sites on a global computer network featuring gifts and jewelry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Graphics Network Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Graphics Network Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named BRILLIANT SOLUTIONS FOR THE LUXURY MARKETPLACE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 11, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 8, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 9, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 9, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 9, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 2, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 12, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 20, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 28, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 3, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 24, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 18, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |